Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting frequency limits to LDFCS and ribbon plots #314

Open
jjkenned opened this issue Apr 18, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Setting frequency limits to LDFCS and ribbon plots #314

jjkenned opened this issue Apr 18, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@jjkenned
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

I find it difficult to visualize lower and more restricted frequency singing species using the False Colour Spectrograms and ribbon plots.

Describe the solution you'd like

A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

I'd like to be able to restrict the frequencies represented when making LDFCS and when making ribbon plots. Ideally it could be done before audio2csv just to save space and computing power, but it would also just be helpful to have when forming the visualizations.

Describe alternatives you've considered

A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Zooming in to the FCS is fine, but it's not as consistent as it could be for visualization.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

This would really help with using these features to track singing behaviour in smaller groups of target species.

@atruskie
Copy link
Member

atruskie commented Apr 19, 2020

Like a bandpass for false colour spectrograms. Great idea.

What do you want to happen to the ouput images?

  1. they have content removed (i.e. a bandpass of 0 -- 1000 Hz, would produce an image that is ~26px high?)
  2. the same as 1. but for the image to get aritificially scaled as well (say a 2x zoom)?
    • such a "zoom" won't add any new information, it'd be the same as zooming in in a image viewer
    • the images would take up more space on disk
    • they would naturally be bigger though and may be easier to view

@jjkenned
Copy link
Author

I think option 2 would be better for my purposes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants