Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refresh of purpose/scope needed - What kind of wallets/companies/VCs need this? #26

Open
bumblefudge opened this issue Dec 1, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@bumblefudge
Copy link

Not sure if this is an ## Abstract or an ## Architectural Assumptions or a ## Political Ideology section, but I am a little unclear on what the assumptions are-- who has what rights or expectations about how the wallet renders these credentials? Are certain security expections or obligations being assumed on the part of wallet and/or issuer? Etc

@brentzundel brentzundel added this to the v1 milestone Dec 1, 2022
@andorsk
Copy link
Collaborator

andorsk commented Jan 5, 2023

Discussed on DIF call.

@bumblefudge

  • Successful would be adoption of ecosystem or foundations using it.
  • Should be focused on getting smaller ecosystem at the beginning.
  • Simplicity and iterative : focus on getting stable versions. Higher priority than adoption.
  • Likes the idea of extensions. Conformant but ignore. Need a profiling language.

colby harrision:

  • To do anything advanced need to add metadata.
  • Bare minimum: give basic means of organizing data.
  • Maybe what we are looking for isn't adding to the spec, but possibly some style spec. Extension to spec. j

@ThierryThevenet
Copy link

It would be also useful to share that standard with the siopv2 issuance specs. As today they propose a "display" attribute which is not as rich as WR

@bumblefudge bumblefudge changed the title Refresh of purpose/scope needed - What kind of wallets/companies need this? Refresh of purpose/scope needed - What kind of wallets/companies/VCs need this? Jan 19, 2023
@andorsk
Copy link
Collaborator

andorsk commented Feb 9, 2023

  • Discussed Feb 9: @bumblefudge would you be willing to lead the charge on this effort? Can we assign to you?
  • @csuwildcat offered to collaborate on this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants