Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question about the distance information in KITTI dataset #8

Open
Jichen66 opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

question about the distance information in KITTI dataset #8

Jichen66 opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@Jichen66
Copy link

Hi,

I have a question about the distance information in KITTI dataset. Can we directly use the value of z location(in camera coordinates) as the ground truth distance between the object and camera?

I am looking for your reply. Thank you very much in advance!

Best Regards

@SamSamhuns
Copy link

Yes, I think so, I did the training on the raw z location values (without standardizing them) and the prediction works fine. As far as I know, you don't need to standardize the y values (z loc). The original author standardizes the z-loc values and later transforms them back which I think is unnecessary.

However, standardizing the X values (bbox coordinates) is very beneficial. And I think it is better to use the width and height of the bounding boxes rather than using the four bbox coordinates for the distance regression.

@Jichen66
Copy link
Author

yes, I also tried the raw z location values before. Btw, what do you mean by standardizing?

@SamSamhuns
Copy link

Set the bounding box width and height to 0 mean and 1 standard deviation.

@ArunMathewML
Copy link

is it necessary to give zloc value for accurate predictions

@omer-m
Copy link

omer-m commented Dec 16, 2021

Hy any can tell me about the dataset... because I can't find it on KITTI - Vision Benchmark Suite website

http://www.cvlibs.net/datasets/kitti/index.php

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants