Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rule Idea: Missing spec #308

Closed
Licenser opened this issue Dec 9, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Rule Idea: Missing spec #308

Licenser opened this issue Dec 9, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@Licenser
Copy link
Contributor

Licenser commented Dec 9, 2015

Enforcing every function to be spec'ed improves code quality as it improves the results from dialyzer. A nifty rule would be to create an error for functions missing a spec.
@elbrujohalcon
Copy link
Member

You don't need elvis for that, the compiler can warn you about those things on its own.

@Licenser
Copy link
Contributor Author

Licenser commented Dec 9, 2015

Oh I didn't knew that :) awesome!

@Licenser Licenser closed this as completed Dec 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@elbrujohalcon @Licenser