Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The ignorance of "conflict" label #18

Open
Bigggapple opened this issue Sep 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

The ignorance of "conflict" label #18

Bigggapple opened this issue Sep 2, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@Bigggapple
Copy link

Hi, I would like to know if you do any dataset processing in the joint task scenario. You mentioned in your paper that you have ignored the "conflict" label in ATSC task, so I want to know if you have deleted those sentences with "conflict" labels in the evaluation of the joint task. To be more specific, if the model did not predict the polarity as "conflict" in the joint task, would you ignore this wrong prediction? Because there are only examples for positive, neutral, and negative cases in the instruction, I was thinking about how you treat the "conflict" case in the joint task. Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant