Inject additional libraries for full X11 functionality

[elezar]

This change updates X11 library detection to ensure that this works for a wider range of driver installations.

This includes the changes from #490

[elezar]

@ehfd I realized that I hadn't cleaned up the changes from #490 prior to merging them.

I therefore had to revert them and created this PR to include all the relevant changes.

@tux-rampage your commits in the #490 were not signed off and as such you're not included as an author here. Feel free to push some signed-off commits here.

[ehfd]

Separately, I see no issues and approve the code.

[ArangoGutierrez]

small typo

[ehfd]

I think @tux-rampage might not have access to the branch.

Signed-off-by: tux-rampage <tuxrampage@gmail.com>

This is the required string.

[elezar]

I think @tux-rampage might not have access to the branch.

Signed-off-by: tux-rampage <tuxrampage@gmail.com>

This is the required string.

Yes, I would suppose that they don't have access. @tux-rampage feel free to create a PR targetting this branch indicating that you sign-off your work. Or coinfirm that I can add the string myself.

[ehfd]

@elezar On a separate note, what would be the best way to detect the kernel driver version from inside the container, other than /proc/driver/nvidia/version, which is not available with WSL?

[elezar]

@elezar On a separate note, what would be the best way to detect the kernel driver version from inside the container, other than /proc/driver/nvidia/version, which is not available with WSL?

You mean the "RM_VERSION"? Here one would probably have to rely on an NVML call.

[ehfd]

@elezar I did a bit more exploring, and it seems like the RM_VERSION of WSL is similar, but almost always different to the https://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/ driver download page. Having issues with provisioning the nvidia_drv.so and libglxserver_nvidia.so X server libraries inside WSL + Container toolkit.

I'll open a new issue about this.

[ehfd]

Continuing in #563

[ehfd]

@tux-rampage Could you possibly approve this PR and indicate that Signed-off-by: tux-rampage <tuxrampage@gmail.com> is good? We're unable to merge this.

[tux-rampage]

@tux-rampage Could you possibly approve this PR and indicate that Signed-off-by: tux-rampage <tuxrampage@gmail.com> is good? We're unable to merge this.

Sure, will do this later or tomorrow morning.
Edit: Just reviewed the changes, and you can add the sign off yourself, as you suggested, if you don't want to wait on a PR from me. It would be an empty commit anyways.

Changes made