Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

terNO_LINE and terNO_RIPPLE show incorrect explanations #2546

Open
mvadari opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

terNO_LINE and terNO_RIPPLE show incorrect explanations #2546

mvadari opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Typo or other small documentation error content updates Updating, cleaning up, or rewriting existing content for better usability or new contexts

Comments

@mvadari
Copy link
Contributor

mvadari commented Apr 15, 2024

Page: https://xrpl.org/docs/references/protocol/transactions/transaction-results/ter-codes/#ter-codes

Both terNO_LINE and terNO_RIPPLE have this explanation:

Used internally only. This code should never be returned.

This is an incorrect explanation.

@mDuo13
Copy link
Collaborator

mDuo13 commented Apr 15, 2024

I believe that the tec versions of these codes is normal but the ter version is not normally returned. A search of the rippled source implies this might be correct, but the total code path is unclear.

@mvadari
Copy link
Contributor Author

mvadari commented Apr 16, 2024

I appear to have incorrectly extrapolated from one to the other - that does seem to be true for terNO_LINE, but not terNO_RIPPLE, which does seem to have legitimate code paths.
Search link: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3AXRPLF%2Frippled+terNO_RIPPLE&type=code

@mDuo13 mDuo13 added bug Typo or other small documentation error content updates Updating, cleaning up, or rewriting existing content for better usability or new contexts labels Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Typo or other small documentation error content updates Updating, cleaning up, or rewriting existing content for better usability or new contexts
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants