Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(argo-cd): Add existingVolumes setting for remaining deployments with emptyDir volumes #2456

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bodgit
Copy link
Contributor

@bodgit bodgit commented Jan 26, 2024

#2410 added the existingVolumes setting for the repo-server component. This PR adds an equivalent setting to the other Argo CD components that have emptyDir volumes in their deployment so you can either use a PVC or further tune the emptyDir volume with sizeLimit parameters, etc. (which is what I do).

Checklist:

  • I have bumped the chart version according to versioning
  • I have updated the documentation according to documentation
  • I have updated the chart changelog with all the changes that come with this pull request according to changelog.
  • Any new values are backwards compatible and/or have sensible default.
  • I have signed off all my commits as required by DCO.
  • My build is green (troubleshooting builds).

@yu-croco
Copy link
Collaborator

FYI
Regarding the failed CI, #2460 is related. There is a PR for fixing in upstream, let's wait for it.

@yu-croco
Copy link
Collaborator

FYI: The CI is fixed now. 👍

@bodgit
Copy link
Contributor Author

bodgit commented Jan 30, 2024

@yu-croco Rebased and all tests now pass.

…s with emptyDir volumes

Signed-off-by: Matt Dainty <matt@bodgit-n-scarper.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@yu-croco yu-croco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Signed-off-by: Matt Dainty <matt@bodgit-n-scarper.com>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 6, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@mbevc1
Copy link
Collaborator

mbevc1 commented Apr 14, 2024

Probably needs rebasing rather than closing? 🤔

@yu-croco
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @bodgit , can you please fetch latest remote diff and resolve conflicts?

Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@mkilchhofer
Copy link
Member

not stale

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants