Unhandled abstract form issue with fun((...)

[rvangraan]

this spec:
-spec module_map(state(), abstract_function()) -> fun((...) -> ok | {error,term()}).

causes these errors:

Error: '{unhandled_abstract_form,
                           {type,[{line,114},{column,55},
                                   {text,"("}],any}}' while applying rule 'no_spec_with_records'.
 Error: '{unhandled_abstract_form,
                           {type,[{line,114},{column,55},
                                  {text,"("}],any}}' while applying rule 'state_record_and_type'.

it is a valid syntax for specs fun((...) -> means a fun of any arity returning a specific type.

Fun :: fun()                  %% any function
       | fun((...) -> Type)     %% any arity, returning Type
       | fun(() -> Type)
       | fun((TList) -> Type)

[jfacorro]

@rvangraan The master branch includes this fix, could you please confirm when you get the chance? This fix will be included in the next 0.2.5 release.

[rvangraan]

Thanks @jfacorro, I will give it a try.