feat: add Togglz provider #415
Conversation
Signed-off-by: liran2000 <liran2000@gmail.com>
|
Hi @bennetelli, @hennr, you can have a look and share your thoughts. Thanks |
| boolean featureBooleanValue = feature.isActive(); | ||
| return ProviderEvaluation.<Boolean>builder() | ||
| .value(featureBooleanValue) | ||
| .reason(Reason.TARGETING_MATCH.name()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You may want to use the reason STATIC since it doesn't look like evaluation context is being used.
https://openfeature.dev/specification/types#resolution-details
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure that STATIC is correct here, since Activation can be done by user even without passing context if I understand correctly.
@bennetelli, @hennr can share their thoughts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wouldn't you need to include FeatureUser when calling isActive?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@beeme1mr I don't think so. It seems like Togglz uses pre-configured features/beans to get these values contextually. For example, to get the user name you configure one of these: https://www.togglz.org/documentation/authentication, which take the user-name from the servlet context, etc.
This is actually configured in the feature (see the constructor) if I understand correctly.
I'm honestly not sure how to properly determine the reason with this provider.
providers/togglz/README.md
Outdated
| # Unofficial Togglz OpenFeature Provider for Java | ||
|
|
||
| ## Usage | ||
| See [TogglzProviderTest.java](./src/test/java/dev/openfeature/contrib/providers/togglz/TogglzProviderTest.java) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It can be addressed in a follow-up PR, but please add more information to the readme. Please include information such as install instructions, basic usage, limitations (only booleans are supported), etc.
Signed-off-by: liran2000 <liran2000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: liran2000 <liran2000@gmail.com>
|
@liran2000 will have a look at it tomorrow. Thanks for your PR :) it's has been on my list for a while as well |
|
@liran2000 I'll give this a proper review soon from a general OpenFeature perspective. In the meantime, could you add yourself (and anyone else relevant, maybe @bennetelli ?) to the component owners? We're trying to identify owners for all new components. It functions somewhat like CODEOWNERS but just adds you as assignee when these files change. |
Signed-off-by: liran2000 <liran2000@gmail.com>
|
hi @bennetelli, can you review this from Togglz point of view ? |
…ure#415) Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Add Togglz provider.
Related Issues
Togglz issue.
Notes