Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump jsonpath to 2.9.0 to fix the vulnerability #2118

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vishnu1074
Copy link

Describe what has changed in this PR

Currently temporal-testing is using json path 2.8.0 which is causing the temporal-testing to have a CVE detected in maven.

Temporal-testing mvn: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.temporal/temporal-testing/1.23.2

jsonpath mvn: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.jayway.jsonpath/json-path

To fix this, I am bumping the jsonpath version to 2.9.0 which seems to be free from the cve.

Why I made this change ?

I want to use temporal for my projects and snyk is detecting a vulnerability for temporal-testing jar(3p vulnerability). Hence fixing this.

Currently temporal-testing is using json path 2.8.0 which is causing the
temporal-testing to have a CVE detected in maven.

Temporal-testing mvn:  https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.temporal/temporal-testing/1.23.2

jsonpath mvn: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.jayway.jsonpath/json-path

To fix this, I am bumping the jsonpath version to 2.9.0 which seems to be free from the cve.
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


Sai Vishnu Bhyravajosyula seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants